Skip to content
InsightsGrowthWorking out what’s wrong

SEO and GEO: what changed, and what to do about it

· 6 min read

For twenty years, being findable meant ranking. The mechanics were understood, the measurement was mature, and everyone competed on the same board.

That board still exists. A second one appeared next to it, and the rules are not the same.

What actually changed

Search engines return a list and let the person choose. Assistants return an answer and choose for them. So the unit of competition moved from "appear on the page" to "be one of the names in the response" — and the second is a much smaller doorway.

This does not make ranking worthless. It makes ranking necessary and no longer sufficient.

What carries over

More than the discourse suggests. Site health, sensible structure, clear language, credible depth on a subject — all of it helps in both. A site that is genuinely good at explaining what it does tends to do better in search and in assistant answers, because both are ultimately trying to work out what the page is about.

What does not carry over

  • Keyword density and its descendants. An assistant is not counting terms; repetition mostly makes text worse to read and no more likely to be cited.
  • Volume as a strategy. Forty thin pages targeting variations of a phrase is a search tactic that ages badly and does nothing for citation.
  • Position tracking as the measure. There is no rank to hold. You are named or you are not.

What is genuinely new

Being attributable. A search engine can rank a page it only partly understands. An assistant naming your business is making a small claim on your behalf, and it prefers sources where the claim is easy to support — where what you do, where you do it and roughly what it costs are stated plainly and consistently.

Consistency matters more here than in search. If your pricing is described three different ways across three pages, a system has no way to decide which is true, and the safe move is to cite somebody else.

Where to actually start

  • Ask the assistants your buyers’ questions and write down what comes back
  • Fix contradictions across your own site before adding anything new
  • State geography, services and pricing model in plain text and in structured data
  • Answer real questions visibly, in the shape they are asked
  • Re-measure monthly

None of that is exotic, and most of it improves conventional search too. The main shift is not tactical — it is accepting that "we rank well" is no longer the same statement as "we get found".

Common questions

Quick answers.

Does SEO still matter?

Yes. Ranking is now necessary rather than sufficient, and most of the underlying work — structure, clarity, site health — serves both search and assistant answers.

Should I hire separately for GEO?

Usually not. It is a different bar for largely the same work rather than a separate discipline with a separate budget. Be wary of anyone selling it as an entirely new line item.

How do I measure GEO?

By asking the assistants your buyers’ questions and recording whether you are named, monthly. There is no rank to track, and no mature tooling yet.

Next step

Ready to put this into practice?

Book a consultation and we will map where this applies to your business — and you keep the findings either way.